Saturday, May 28, 2011

On Being an Atelierista: letter to the next Atelierista

For the last 2 years I have been trying to define the job of Atelierista. If I were to write a letter to the person who takes this job after me, there is one thing that I would want them to understand more than any other. It is something that is not easy to  make happen, and that is true collaboration with teachers and children.





The kind of collaboration I'm talking about makes inquiry in the classroom richer. 


While preserving her voice as the voice of an artist in the classroom, it changes the studio teacher's point of view from someone outside looking in, to someone who is a vital part of the children's investigative process. 
  It's easy to help with project time as a warm body, watching the group while the teacher works with just a few children, or as an extra set of hands, helping students build a structure or find a material. It is even easy for me (because I have been at it for so long), to come into a classroom and make something happen, to see where the children are and to scaffold them to the next step of whatever it is they're doing. It is much more difficult to truly be 'in' the inquiry, because that takes a whole different level of communication with the teacher and with his or her documentation.


For instance, I have been having conversations with the teachers in the Meadow room all year. I know what their students think about birds, about the media they like to use, and about the relationships and interests of those students. I know this because the teachers share the children's drawings, transcripts of their conversations, and have me in circle. We talk and email and brainstorm together at odd moments, but enough so that I understand. The children know me and think of me as one of their teachers. So, even when I have a small group in the studio I feel like I am supporting the work of the classroom. Somehow the studio teacher has to make that happen with all of the classes in the school, if the atelier is to be as good as it can be.
 Garden room teacher Sara and I often talk about the 3 year old children's theories about sound, light and danger, and we have our own informal research project into how to use the echo-y, dark basement space as a provocation. We talk occasionally, and we email a lot, and Sara sends me photos and drawings and links that go along with our questions. Mostly, our collaboration consists of meeting regularly with small groups of children and going down to the basement to try things out. 




Today we set up the overhead projector down there and observed the children's interaction with the projected images.


How to help the teachers let you in to their process is so difficult. They are busy every second of the day, and the studio schedule is packed trying to find time to work with children from 2 to 8th grade. Often when teachers want me to spend time in their classrooms I can't. There must be a way to change the studio day to make collaboration happen more easily. The key seems to be in sharing of raw documentation, the kind of in-process stuff that teachers might be shy about showing to someone from outside the classroom. This documentation is how I can get a look at the children's inquiry even when I'm not in the room with them.


It is important that the school reach intersubjectivity about the studio, and it is hard to know how to deepen the perception. There are so many ways to see it as an add-on or special place, but I hope that eventually the studio and the Atelierista will not be a voice from outside the classroom, but will seem an integrated part of the school and the teachers' and children's inquiry process.





and ps. Sorry if I scared anybody, I have not turned in my notice or anything like that...YET (mwah ha ha)
(-:

Thursday, May 19, 2011

social constructivism explained?

First graders were talking about Sabot school, and why they think it is "so awesome"...

video

"everybody knows a little bit about something, and then we join that together and we all know a lot... and we make kind of like a network... Yes!, yes we do, and the best part is, we all have great friends. And being nice is also important."
After the camera was off, H. added "See, because knowledge is so big, just one person can't know it all, so we have to work together."

After this, they had a discussion about naming their field day team the 'knowledge network', but yesterday chose the Peregrine Team, because peregrine falcons are clever AND fast. Thanks to 1st grade teacher Allison for collaborating with me all year!

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Teacher Appreciation Day

Sabot preschool has a lovely tradition- on a day in May, the children arrive with a flower for their teacher. These flowers are assembled by parents into beautiful bouquets. Later, they serve a wonderful lunch. What a fine day. Thank you!





these are some of the wonderful notes that children gave me



Sunday, May 8, 2011

True meetings and resistance against the taken for granted

A couple of Sabot staffers went to Calgary last weekend for a conference, and came back talking about what and who they had heard, including speaker Harold Gothson. In the book Childhoods; a Handbook, part of which is available as a google book, Gothson has a chapter called 'Appropriating Reggio Emilia; from Cults to Cultural Constructions'

Reflecting on being influenced by the Reggio Approach, he asks the question "What happens with ideas and narrating of experiences when they travel from one context to another?  What happens with the idea, and what happens with the receiving context?"

The narrating of experiences -the story -changes with the context. I can't really know what it was like in Calgary, but I can hear the stories they will tell me about it and form my own image. In this way I can learn from their experience. In thinking about the Reggio approach, or even old Sabot preschool, I can listen to the stories (even the ones I tell myself), and apply what I get from them to my new context. Gothson writes that he views Reggio through his Swedish eyeglasses, just as I view everything through my metaphorical eyeglasses, and so do you.
Gothson goes on to talk about looking for new points of view in order to challenge your own established ones. He talks about the benefits to educators of challenging personal perspectives by looking at other schools and other ways of doing things. He writes that Reggio educators look for disturbances, seeking out "contexts that make them uncomfortable and force them to reconstruct and develop their ideas... in the ongoing effort to find new confusing and provoking encounters to make it possible to create resistance against the taken for granted."


I'm not sure about the translation here, but the way this is worded does capture something about disequilibrium, the feeling people get before we understand something new. It does feel uncomfortable, confusing and provoking sometimes. 
We have to understand that ideas must change with the context and that the place it is to be taken to will also change. So that's why there is no Reggio Emilia 'program' or 'method' that can be implemented anywhere. 


Gothson writes "all narrations are built on interpretation, choices and interests.. and invite a complex and contradictory reality that surrounds every decision of action and thinking in general." . 


Does that mean we take what we want from our inspirations, or that we take what we need? 
Either way, it implies that we must give careful consideration when reconceptualizing an idea in a new context, resisting "superficiality and rigidity".
This year, having moved the school across the river into a new building, the preschool staff is finding out what parts of our long story still work in the new context. I really like experiences that cause me to question my habits, provide 'resistance against the taken for granted" and make me think critically about my point of view, but  the feeling of starting all over again from scratch is very unsettling. Luckily there is a group that can work together to represent this old story and create the new one.


While reflecting here, I started to think about truth. If what we know is just our version of a narrative, can there be such thing as truth? Gothson writes that there is no "Reggio Emilia", just our interpretations of it.


It turns out that there is a social constructivist theory of truth, that truth is constructed by social processes and is affected by context (according to wikipedia.org), which I never thought about until now, but which seems about right to me. 


For me it comes down to a commitment to the value and values of children. How to make that visible in our community and culture is what brings me back to the inspiring ideas from the schools of Reggio Emilia again and again. 


Gothson has more to say about values; Read it here books.google.com

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Snake part 2


Showing the snake skin at circle in the Garden room.

R. "It's a dead snake. I think it's a dead snake."
A. C. "I have a book about it, and they poke...snake skin comes off."
C."Or maybe the snake has new skin. Snakes take off their skin from rocks. They scratch themselves on rocks."
J. "It's only the skin. I heard Anna say it's only the skin."
D. "What happened to the bones?"




Measuring the children and the snake skin. 









Friday, May 6, 2011

snake!

 Georgia found this snakeskin during Exploratory time on the way from the Middle School to the main building.

She let me keep it in the studio for a few days to show it to the preschoolers.
While they observed the skin and talked about it, I learned from them that the scales on the bottom of the snake (visible in the picture at left), are "grippers" that grip surfaces and allow the snake to move. I learned that this was probably a black snake, and not a copperhead, because no diamond pattern was visible in the scales (when I looked online it did seem to match a black snake skin). It was taller than all of the pre-schoolers.  You could see the eyes and even tiny nostril holes if you looked closely.






























Thanks, Georgia

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Big Kids in the Studio -Wednesday

4th and 5th graders came to the studio for a rainy-day recess

1st graders work on scenery and curtains for the play they are writing about Medieval Scotland



middle schoolers working on their exploratory projects

kindergarteners mess about with basket making reed in preparation for building
a large birds nest


practice weaving with paper
older preschooler shows a younger one something he's
discovered about propellers
propellers, tracing, mural painting, bird machine construction, and fun