| two year olds put their houses on a map |
So in a traditional classroom you might see a literacy center where children can practice certain writing activities, and in a Sabot classroom you will find writing materials, a variety of papers, things that make marks, envelopes, books and other tools and materials that can be used for writing. One mistake people sometimes make is to assume that the fact that the environment is set up differently and may look looser and less formal in a more progressive school means that teachers don't look for those moments when a child is ready to receive some information about forming letters or to support specific literacy skills.
But it seems to me there is a difference in control in centers vs. provocations. In a center the teacher has decided what will happen, and in the case of a provocation, the teacher provides some things and then watches what happens when the children come in contact with them...the teacher is not in control.
| the children draw paths between the houses so they can visit each other |
Some of the materials in our school may be the same as those found in a traditional early childhood classroom, but on a fundamental level, their purpose is different.
here are some links to some articles about centers, some more progressively focused than others; www.pbs.org/teachers/earlychildhood/articles/centertime.html
www.communityplaythings.com/designingenvironments
www.trcabc.com/implementing-literacy-centers-in-the-early-childhood-classroom/
For me, centres are relatively fixed. We all have a block corner, reading corner etc. And yes, there is 'provocation' within them. In Australia we use the term 'intentional teaching' in a similiar way to the concept of provocation. It is about really tuning in to an individual or group of children and observing their current interest and reflecting on how we can 'intentionally' provide opportunities, resources etc. to encourage them to progress in their thinking about their interest. As in recognizing their 'zone of proximal development' and 'scaffolding' their learning (Vygostsky).
ReplyDeleteGreat post! :)
Thank you for this post, Anna. Sometimes it is hard to put these thoughts into words, and I agree with your description. Sometimes it is not so much about the things - so many classrooms look different - but it is really the intention behind the things that a teacher chooses to present that matters.
ReplyDeleteHappy New Year!
Thank you so much for this thoughtful essay. In the art education world some of us are making strong connections to exemplary early childhood practice to what we call teaching for artistic behavior/choice-based art ed. http://tinyurl.com/y8rtxfb
ReplyDeleteThis post is a wonderful resource, Thanks! I'll be sure to pass it on.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this thought-provoking post. Here are some of my own musings in response to this idea - would love to continue this conversation!
ReplyDeletehttp://artatthecenter.blogspot.com/2012/01/centers-and-provocations-response.html